Operator precedence

Precedence rules in C2 are different from C/C++. Here are all precedence levels in C2, listed from highest (1) to lowest (11):

1. (), [], ., postfix ++ and --
2. prefix -, ~, prefix *, &, prefix ++ and --
3. infix *, /, %
4. <<, >>
5. ^, |, infix &
6. +, infix -
7. ==, !=, >=, <=, >, <
8. &&, ||
9. ternary ?:
10. =, *=, /=, %=, +=, -=, <<=, >>=, &=, ^=, |=
11. ,

The main difference is that bitwise operations and shift has higher precedence than addition/subtraction and multiplication/division in C2. Bitwise operations also have higher precedence than the relational operators. Also, there is no difference in precedence between && || or between the bitwise operators.

Examples

a + b >> c + d

(a + b) >> (c + d) // C (+ - are evaluated before >>)
a + (b >> c) + d   // C2 (>> is evaluated before + -)

a & b == c

a & (b == c)       // C  (bitwise operators are evaluated after relational)
(a & b) == c       // C2 (bitwise operators are evaluated before relational)

a || b && c

a || (b && c)      // C  (&& binds tighter than ||)
(a || b) && c      // C2 (Same precedence, left-to-right evaluation)

a > b == c < d

(a > b) == (c < d) // C  (< > binds tighter than ==)
((a > b) == c) < d // C2 (Same precedence, left-to-right evaluation)

a | b ^ c & d

a | ((b ^ c) & d)  // C  (All bitwise operators have different precedence)
((a | b) ^ c) & d  // C2 (Same precedence, left-to-right evaluation)

The change in precedence of the bitwise operators corrects a long standing issue in the C specification. The change in precedence for shift operations goes towards making the precedence less surprising.

Conflating the precedence of || and &&, relational and equality operations, and all bitwise operations was motivated by simplification: few remember the exact internal differences in precedence between bitwise operators.

Left-to-right offers a very simple model to think about the internal order of operations, and encourages use of explicit ordering, as best practice in C is to use parentheses anyway.